Some notes
taken from Dr. Jean S. M. Willette, Dr. April
Renée Lynch, The Met’s exhibition of Chardin, and from Khan Academy.
What was Rococo about? What were the goals?
Rococo art
was a fashionable art trend that catered to the rich, elite aristocracy. These
people dedicated their lives to leisure, throwing parties, having affairs,
gossiping, and spending absurd amounts of money on luxuries like clothing,
mansions, music, and art. So, Rococo art reflected their lifestyle. Unlike
Baroque art of the past, this art was silly and humorous, rather than serious
or religious. It was also highly flattering, so portraits were in high demand.
While Rococo artists continued to use Greek myths for subject matter, it was
seen more as an excuse to show erotic nude women, rather than teach ethical
lessons. You could argue that all mythical paintings are voyeuristic, but the
Rococo was more open about it.
Rococo still faces a lot of criticism today. Some feel it’s tasteless,
others that it’s not historically significant. And, of course, it was built on
the backs of the poor who suffered under aristocracy. Nevertheless, Rococo art,
while old-fashioned, shows incredible craftsmanship, draughtsmanship, and
beauty.
Where did
Rococo get the name?
While no
one knows for sure, it’s assumed to be a play on words, combining the French
words rocaille, meaning rock and coquilles, meaning shell.
Rocks and shells play a prominent role in Rococo decoration.
A bit of
historical context:
Rococo
began as a protest against Baroque architecture. Rococo artists and designers
felt it was too grand, rigid, and symmetrical. They wanted their works to be
more graceful, delicate, ornate, floral, and flowing. They also felt that
interior design should be carefully planned so that every part of a room from
floor to ceiling matched, as one big work of art. Rococo was also strongly
influenced by Chinese art and design.
While the most famous Rococo works and artists are French, it traces its
roots back to Italian architects of the late Baroque, for example Borromini.
Many such architects were hired by French and German princes to build new
structures, where this new Rococo style developed. While the English rejected
Rococo in architecture, they used it in decorative arts such as silverware,
ceramics, and furniture. Rococo art died along with aristocracy during the
French Revolution. New political forces needed a new type of art – the
Neo-Classical. All the greatest writers of the Age of Enlightenment – Voltaire,
Rousseau, and Diderot, all lambasted the Rococo.
The
underlying philosophy of the period:
The Rococo is
best seen as a protest against the Baroque aesthetic, in an attempt to develop
a new, better form of beauty that would define an age of pleasure. Philosopher,
Madame du Châtelet said, “We must begin by saying to ourselves that we have
nothing else to do in the world but to seek pleasant sensations and feelings.”
Rococo art explored themes about love, and romance, often excusing infidelity.
Rococo aesthetics were best explained by the English artist, William
Hogarth, in his controversial book, The Analysis of Beauty, in 1753.
Hogarth argued that beautiful art consisted of six qualities: fitness, variety,
regularity, intricacy, simplicity, and quantity. You might notice that these
characteristics are at odds with each other. How can an artwork be both
intricate and simple? Hogarth was arguing for a careful balance between these
opposing qualities. He also advocated the gestural curving ‘S’ line, common to
the Rococo, over the rigid straight lines of older styles.
The
Anti-Rococo
Two
important painters focused on scenes of the simple day-to-day life of
commoners. Jean-Baptiste Greuze and Jean-Baptiste-Siméon
Chardin. Their work reflected the philosophy
of Rousseau and Diderot, who considered them the only great
artists of the age. They felt that people are inherently good, but that society
corrupts us. Rousseau said, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”
Grueze and Chardin felt that simple farmers were more in touch with nature and
therefore better. Although they’re referred to as “genre painters” for
their scenes of domestic life, you can think of them as early Romantics, and
they were both highly influential to later generations.
How was
it represented in the other arts – music, architecture, and literature?
Rococo
started in architecture, and moved into painting and sculpture as decorative
touches to add to ornamented interiors and exterior gardens. Most of the great
literature of the time ran counter to Rococo – the philosophers Voltaire,
Rousseau, Diderot, etc. Music of the time falls into two categories, Galant
music of the early Rococo, featuring Boccherini and various sons of J.S. Bach,
and the Classical period with
Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven – one of the greatest moments in music
history.
Was it
great? Was it flawed?
In terms of
craft, skill, composition, story-telling, and mood, it’s hard to criticize the
leading artists of this period (although some of Watteau’s paintings are a bit
clumsy. He was much better at drawing than painting). Its single greatest flaw was
the philosophy behind it, the cruel ignorance and indifference of those rich
enough to enjoy life, without a care or consideration for the poor and sick who
couldn’t. Rococo art is a reflection of the very problems that led to the
downfall of the social order. Although Marie Antoinette never actually said,
“Let them eat cake”, when hearing of the starving masses with no bread––it was
widely circulated that she did, and that was enough to anger people into
cutting off her head.
Some
leading figures, in chronological order:
Jean-Antoine
Watteau (1684-1721)
– considered the first great Rococo painter.
François Boucher (1703-1770)
Jean-Honore
Fragonard
(1732-1806)
Élisabeth Louise Vigée-Le Brun (1755-1842) – French portrait
painter, famous for painting Marie-Antoinette
English
Rococo Painters:
William
Hogarth (1697-1764) – English portrait painter & humourist
Sir
Joshua Reynolds
(1723-1792) – English portrait painter
Thomas
Gainsborough
(1727-1788) – English portrait painter
Anti-Rococo
Jean-Baptiste-Siméon Chardin (1699-1779)
Jean-Baptiste
Greuze (1725-1805)
Venetian
Rococo
The
Tiepolo Family – Giambattista, Domenico & Lorenzo, a father
& sons team that painted large scale frescoes of religious and mythical
scenes. Apart from their pastel colours, they share little in common with
Rococo artists. I feel they’re mislabelled and should be seen as late Baroque
masters.
Some of
the most famous artworks of the time:
The
Palace of Versailles
This was a summer palace for the kings of France.
It’s hard to say when it was finished, since kings and queens kept adding onto
it, up to 1789 when Louis XVI and his queen Marie-Antoinette were dragged out
and executed. Construction began in 1624, the Baroque period, by Louis XIII.
Kings Louis XV and XVI added onto the structure, demolishing some parts they
considered old-fashioned, rebuilding it in the Rococo style. Today, it’s one of
France’s greatest museums, drawing around 10 million tourists a year.
The
Pleasures of Love,
by Jean-Antoine Watteau, 1717
This is a simple, idyllic scene of people
enjoying a picnic and each other’s company.
The
Rape of Europa, by François Boucher, 1747
Alternately called the Abduction or Kidnapping of
Europa, this Greek myth is popular in art history, having been painted
countless times. In this story, the beautiful young Europa is seduced by Zeus,
who takes the form of a bull. She climbs on his back, and he swims to Crete where
he shows his true form, and the couple have three children together. Europa
becomes the queen of Crete. It’s unclear whether Europa was really raped, or
merely seduced, but her blasé expression seems to
indicate she’s okay with the situation. Needless to say, this painting is
controversial.
The
Swing, by
Jean-Honore Fragonard in 1767
In this
painting, there’s a man and woman who are having an affair. The woman gets some
unsuspecting gentleman to give her a push on a swing. What he doesn’t know is
her lover is hiding in the bushes below. As she spreads her legs for him, he
gets a view up her dress. The garden surrounding them is filled with light and
delicate details, and pastel colours. It suggests an immoral and carefree
lifestyle.
The
Diligent Mother,
by Jean-Baptiste Chardin, 1740
This painting was a gift presented to King Louis
XV, who eventually gave the artist a pension of 500 Livres a year. It shows a
dutiful mother caring for her children while she sews, an example of moral
virtue – the kind of work championed by Diderot, and a sharp contrast to
Fragonard’s Swing.
The
Father’s Curse: The Ungrateful Son & The Son Punished, by Jean-Baptiste Greuze, 1777
This painting shows a father cursing his son, as
he goes off to join the army. In the second painting, the son returns home to
find his father has died. The son is at fault here for deserting his family,
who also need him to work and provide for them. When he returns his punishment
is the shame and guilt of seeing his father dead, that he might have been saved
if he had only been able to afford a doctor.
No comments:
Post a Comment